![]() ![]() It is perplexing that the rendering quality would be subpar. On various forums, I often come across comments mentioning the inferior quality of DaVinci Resolve's rendering compared to HandBrake, despite the former being an industry-grade post-production tool. HendrikvdV wrote:I use DaVinci Resolve Studio for my editing and color grading needs. One such plugin for x264 is available here. However, Resolve now has a support for installing encoder plugins, meaning a developer can implement any codec for use with Resolve. While they are great, they would require a license if distributed with a commercial application like Resolve. The codecs available in HandBrake like x264 and x265 are insanely optimized CPU encoders, x264 has been in development for over 20 years. This should produce a very nice end result that isn't too big. For instance, if you have a recent Nvidia GPU (3000 or 4000 series) and set the encoder in Resolve to NVIDIA and set Rate Control to "Constant QP", try setting the Constant QP values to something low, like 12. Those have improved over the years and their implementation in Resolve are a bit better now as well. The H.264/H.265 encoders available to Resolve are usually hardware encoders in your GPU/CPU. What you're refering to is encoding, which happens after Resolve has rendered the image. Images are rendered using the same engine whether you are delivering a perfect lossless file or a highly compressed file. ![]() When you say "rendering quality" it sounds like the render engine in Resolve is bad, it's not. The "industry" doesn't use H.264/H.265 for delivering a master file. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |